<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NLTK vs MontyLingua Part of Speech Taggers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.quibb.org/2009/03/nltk-vs-montylingua-part-of-speech-taggers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.quibb.org/2009/03/nltk-vs-montylingua-part-of-speech-taggers/</link>
	<description>Software development and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 14:45:18 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: NLTK Regular Expression Parser (RegexpParser) - Blog::Quibb</title>
		<link>http://blog.quibb.org/2009/03/nltk-vs-montylingua-part-of-speech-taggers/comment-page-1/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>NLTK Regular Expression Parser (RegexpParser) - Blog::Quibb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.quibb.org/?p=37#comment-226</guid>
		<description>[...] word in a sentence with its part of speech.  Here is a small comparison I did of python taggers: NLTK vs MontyLingua Part of Speech Taggers.  The NLTK RegexpParser works by running regular expressions on top of the part of speech tags [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] word in a sentence with its part of speech.  Here is a small comparison I did of python taggers: NLTK vs MontyLingua Part of Speech Taggers.  The NLTK RegexpParser works by running regular expressions on top of the part of speech tags [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://blog.quibb.org/2009/03/nltk-vs-montylingua-part-of-speech-taggers/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 14:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.quibb.org/?p=37#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Sure, I&#039;ll do it in another post.  Since I&#039;m using MontyLingua for the tagger and NLTK&#039;s regex chunker there was a bit of conversion that needed to happen to go from one to the other.  I&#039;ll post the whole process.  I&#039;ll send you an email when it&#039;s posted, but don&#039;t expect anything too soon because of the time of year and all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, I&#8217;ll do it in another post.  Since I&#8217;m using MontyLingua for the tagger and NLTK&#8217;s regex chunker there was a bit of conversion that needed to happen to go from one to the other.  I&#8217;ll post the whole process.  I&#8217;ll send you an email when it&#8217;s posted, but don&#8217;t expect anything too soon because of the time of year and all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://blog.quibb.org/2009/03/nltk-vs-montylingua-part-of-speech-taggers/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 20:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.quibb.org/?p=37#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Hi Joe, 

Yes, thanks so much for writing this!  :-)

I&#039;ve used MontyPython for other projects but I&#039;m intregued about the NLTK. 

Can you explain how you used the NLTK&#039;s regex chunker? 

Did you use a grammar that came with the NLTK module or did you write your own? And would you mind sharing it either the code that accesses the NLTK chunker &amp; grammar or the grammar you used? 

cheers, 

Justin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Joe, </p>
<p>Yes, thanks so much for writing this!  :-)</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve used MontyPython for other projects but I&#8217;m intregued about the NLTK. </p>
<p>Can you explain how you used the NLTK&#8217;s regex chunker? </p>
<p>Did you use a grammar that came with the NLTK module or did you write your own? And would you mind sharing it either the code that accesses the NLTK chunker &amp; grammar or the grammar you used? </p>
<p>cheers, </p>
<p>Justin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://blog.quibb.org/2009/03/nltk-vs-montylingua-part-of-speech-taggers/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 20:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.quibb.org/?p=37#comment-21</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re welcome.  I was hoping it would be useful to other people, but keep in mind NLTK is still active while MontyLingua&#039;s last release was in 2004.  At some point NLTK could surpass it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re welcome.  I was hoping it would be useful to other people, but keep in mind NLTK is still active while MontyLingua&#8217;s last release was in 2004.  At some point NLTK could surpass it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Loureiro</title>
		<link>http://blog.quibb.org/2009/03/nltk-vs-montylingua-part-of-speech-taggers/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Loureiro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 01:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.quibb.org/?p=37#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Thank you for sharing your results. Saved me a lot of work and possibly headaches!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for sharing your results. Saved me a lot of work and possibly headaches!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
